My error. - being a knee jerk tax lawyer. Per draft opinion, c-4 promises not to lobby or campaign and thus is described in 170(c) for purposes of the Act and Commission regulations. Not what we tax folk would say. Why set up a c-4 that will operate as a c-3?
-
-
Excellent point. I also do not find the fn in the Panetta opinion cited in the Price draft to be as clear support as I would like. Panetta footnote references AO 1986-39 - which I cannot find.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.