So jeremy... darling... what would YOU have done in these circumstances? 
-
-
-
JC needs to stop virtue signalling and pontificating. Offer your alternative approach should you have been Prime Minister!
-
I think he has done. Have you read his statement?
-
he puts forward a limp, ineffective plan. The use of chemical weapons is a non-negotiable red line. Needs an immediate take down.
-
take down of whom? no one encouraging the strikes has a coherent plan beyond… dropping some bombs
-
Immediate removal of the Assad-led administration. A brutal, criminal government which needs evisceration. Put Assad on trial at The Hague.
-
How does anyone even know it was assad? It seems like a snap judgment to me. The use of chemical weapons by assad makes no sense.
-
What wld be yr alternative explanation? There appears to be no evidence to suggest anything else. And the guy has form re: chemical warfare.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Might not agree with everything
@jeremycorbyn says but he's 100% right on this issue -
Wars been going on for years, they cant gas innocent people and expect to get away with it
-
Yes and ur point is 2 wrongs don't make it right
-
So what do suggest, let them drop chemical weapons on kids or take out their airfields to prevent it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
How much worse can it get than Chemical attacks on their own people? Killing children and even innocent babies! Pure evil!!!
-
Sick sad leader!! Totally agree Xxx
-
I despair of the things one "human being" can do to innocent people! This world isn't a nice place xx
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@jeremycorbyn's right. Bombs on bombs means more innocent people killed. It only fans the flames of an already volatile & hideous situation - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
