Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @BAIntactivists
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @BAIntactivists
-
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
Last night Jeff Brown and I rode as Jonathon Conte’s Critical Integrity joining
@CriticalMass in San Francisco.#i2@BAIntactivistspic.twitter.com/W4JKzApZqZ
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
Thank you, Brendan LaChance for covering today’s
#BloodstainedMen & Friends protest in Casper, Wyoming for Oil City News.#i2https://oilcity.news/general/2019/07/22/circumcision-protesters-gather-in-casper2/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
FWIW, my position is that circumcision is an archaic obscenity, a violation of the rights of a child & the fact that it can be (and often is) conducted outside of clinical conditions and without anaesthesia is utterly abhorrent. >
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
Male genital cutting is unnecessary. It cuts off a functional and highly erogenous part of a male's genitals.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
@BloodstainedMen are in Colorado raising awareness. Male genital cutting is unnecessary and harmful.https://twitter.com/KJCTNews8/status/1150782087705899008 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
P.S. Study thanking Tomlinson, inventor of "AccuCirc" device (http://www.safecirc.com/read-me-2-1 ) & one of lead authors of
@WHO manual for non-consensual circumcision touting his own device, recommending@WHO pre-qualification of AccuCirc for mass African scale-up: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812570/ …pic.twitter.com/nZB6eR3JSf
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
then it should not publish manuals for removing 30-50% of motile, erogenous skin system of penis in non-consenting boys based on "health benefits" in consenting adults (in conjunction w. "religious & cultural" considerations) written by inventors of circ devices. Shame on
@WHO.Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
has sacrificed all credibility on male & female genital cutting. If ritual nicking is human rights violation regardless of cultural/religious significance, & if 'cosmetic' labiaplasty is wrong to perform on infant girls even though it has WHO-scope "health benefits" in women
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
More claims of health benefits for "female circumcision" below. Even cosmetic labiaplasty in West is touted as conferring mental & sexual health benefits to women who choose it, well within
@WHO definition of health. If@WHO conflates adults/infants in males, why not females?pic.twitter.com/nwYH1670BN
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
Defenders of "female circumcision" now argue this, seeing that "health benefits" seems to impress Western arbiters of which forms of child genital cutting are permissible. You even see claims of "cleanliness" in parallel with male circumcision now raised http://www.gypsyonexploration.com/female-circumcision-the-dawoodi-bohra-community-myths-and-facts/ …pic.twitter.com/ambuqdyBXz
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
that
@WHO definition of health is very broad. Not just absence of disease, but "mental & social" wellbeing included. Do social & religious benefits of having vulva modified to fit local cultural norms, avoid teasing, promote marriageability etc., count as health benefits then?pic.twitter.com/eq1MH3CPLZ
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
The "health benefits" used to bolster the latter claim come primarily from studies of sexually active adults undergoing *voluntary* circumcision. So what are the health benefits of voluntary vulva modifications & should these be extrapolated to non-consenting baby girls? Recall
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
@WHO now simultaneously claims Type IV ritual 'nicking' of vulva (which does not remove tissue) is *human rights violation* regardless of consent, culture, or religion, while decision 2 remove 1/3 or more penile skin system in non-consenting babies should factor culture/religion?Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
If such penile laceration & hemorrhage occurs even in developed countries with excellent training programs, using existing clamps and procedures, then surely Tomlinson's new device should be preferred for mass circumcision in developing countries with less excellent training?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
How much money will Tomlinson earn from mass infant circumcision in African countries w. no existing tradition? In
@WHO manual he touts his own invention to reduce risk of penile laceration & hemorrhage, which occurs "even in developed countries with excellent training programs."pic.twitter.com/Xjbg8b9oJC
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
Would it surprise you to learn that
@WHO's Tomlinson applied, in 2005, for a patent on a device he invented for removing "excess foreskin" (i.e., normal, healthy foreskin) from specifically the "neonatal" penis? https://patents.google.com/patent/US7879044B2/en … - again, no evidence this reduces HIV risk.pic.twitter.com/FlNAfp4W6o
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
One of the lead authors of this new
@WHO manual for American-style non-consensual circumcision of boys, now being introduced to countries with no such cultural practice -- citing studies of *adult* circumcision & conflating the two -- is David Tomlinson of@BrownUniversity.pic.twitter.com/SuDIyhm7At
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
Their manual 4 performing non-consensual circ argues "cultural & religious" factors should be considered, in contrast 2
@WHO policy on FGM which says even ritual nicking of the vulva is a *human rights violation* regardless of consent, culture, or religion https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44478/9789241500753_eng.pdf;jsessionid=E38B6CE8234EC3D3E6FA3DF18B76EF05?sequence=1 …pic.twitter.com/PunqzrqiV6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
BayArea Intactivists proslijedio/la je Tweet
Wow.
@WHO claims 2 have 'voluntary' medical male circumcision (VMMC) program, based on data from studies of sexually active *adults* - but now pushes non-voluntary circ of infants, for which there is no controlled evidence of a protective effect against HIV. Plot thickens ...pic.twitter.com/9WA0R30IdS
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Male genital cutting and ear piercing are the only two permanent body modifications parents are allowed to do to their child. Permanent body modifications should be a decision a person makes for his or her own body, not a decision parents make for their son or daughter.https://twitter.com/brentalfloss/status/1149460307825364993 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.