yeah, just wanted to figure out if he’s here in bad faith, or if i’m misunderstanding something.
-
-
Replying to @AwfaFalafa @jess689_ and
When a company does what Word Press says they do IE reject their claim they can be held liable for any actual infringement that court decides has taken place. So in all but the most literal definitions of fair use you won't see wordpress do shit. They just comply
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @AwfaFalafa @jess689_ and
Thomas McSwain Retweeted ajgb2004
Someone in one tweet convinced me what you couldn't in 20 : https://twitter.com/ajgb2004/status/1187683602345144320 … I think it is unreasonable of youtube to go out of their way, of whats mandated by DMCA, in the fashion that they have. I was under the impression they were following the letter of the law.
Thomas McSwain added,
ajgb2004 @ajgb2004Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @jess689_ and 3 othersNo it's not. This is Youtube's internal copyright process. a) DMCA requires taking down the content, not putting ads on it. b) DMCA doesn't give you 30 days to review a counter claim, it gives you 10-14 days to *file a real lawsuit*.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @AwfaFalafa and
It took a single tweet explaining the most extreme basics of this system for you to decide going around spamming people and challenging them to a debate over fair use wasn’t a good idea... dude... maybe wait to speak on shit that you evidently don’t understand? Jfc wow
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jess689_ @AwfaFalafa and
Then why didn't you just start with that instead of the weird reasoning you needed. All it took was one person with the correct facts and that was enough.pic.twitter.com/TDOeVRoAG5
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bucket_Of_Crabs @AwfaFalafa and
Bc I assumed no one would be so arrogant as to copy and paste tweets while having failed to even acquire a basic understanding of the situational context. If someone engages in a discussion purely to challenge someone’s ideas they usually do so with prior knowledge
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @AwfaFalafa @Bucket_Of_Crabs and
Honestly this is 90% of why I stick to memes and just assume anyone like this is acting in bad faith to start with lmao completely not worth the effort
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jess689_ @AwfaFalafa and
I literally wasn't arguing in bad faith. How could I have been if now I agree with your position? I just don't agree with your conveyance. You were both immediately antagonistic. If you had just said what he said the argument woulda been done but you called me a boot licker.pic.twitter.com/2fYXLSXbz5
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
i never called you any names. you sounded confident in your original stance, so i wanted to be sure i wasn’t mistaken in mine. it helps to talk problems out...
-
-
Replying to @AwfaFalafa @jess689_ and
But you were antagonistic. So was I to be fair but I don't really like being called a boot licker, it makes antagonistic.pic.twitter.com/a9K5XXZSCz
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.