Because as we all know, money spent by government entities and quality of outcomes are directly correlatedhttps://twitter.com/mrronclark_/status/980513424072429569 …
True, and unimportant. We could still have a very crappy school with wealthy, well-paid teachers. If you put those same teachers in the public school system they would have a very hard time being successful.
-
-
How the actual fuck do you think that works?
-
Have you ever been in a poor district? My wife worked in one. She worked her ass off, didn’t move the needle much, because everything around her was broken.
-
Yes. I’ve been in many poor districts. I’ve had to convince myself that people were lighting off fireworks (in February). I moved from one place when bullets came through my window and from another when they found a body in our yard.
-
And you think teachers making $100k would solve that?
-
You seem to be someone that clings to whatever surface you can find in order to dismiss the substance. Let’s call it $80k or $120k or some other $ figure that incentivizes top talent to apply. It’s the same logic your so called school leverages to justify its existence.
-
No, you seem to be not understanding my argument, and unwilling t even fathom that yours might be missing something. Teachers can only do so much if the rest of the system is broken. Especially for elementary aged children.
-
Paying teachers more will get better teachers. Better teachers alone will not fix the entire educational system.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.