Because as we all know, money spent by government entities and quality of outcomes are directly correlatedhttps://twitter.com/mrronclark_/status/980513424072429569 …
You’re making a connection I’m not. We would have better teachers if we paid more, yes. That still wouldn’t make our schools the best in the world. The problems in the school system are systemic.
-
-
Incorrect. In fact, the bulk of the problems with our nations schools can be laid squarely (and fairly) at the feet of income inequality. It’s one of those rare instances when the federal government would actually be of some use.
-
You think paying teachers more will solve income inequality?
-
No I don’t, but it will solve the quality of education people in poorer neighborhoods receive which will, in turn, have a direct impact on future earnings. As someone who’s main (only) pitch is the quality of the instructors, you cannot possibly disagree on that.
-
If you took teachers in the poorest districts and paid them $100k each I do not believe it would solve the problem.
-
No, it wouldn’t. But this might be what you’re not getting: offer the job at $100K and then select the best applicants. Please just try and tell me that wouldn’t make a difference.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.