@bitemyapp @AustenAllred Idk, that point seems to defeat itself: the ones bright enough to not need that education probably don't seek it in the 1st place. At the end of the day I do believe quality bootcamps are net value creators.
-
-
At some level that's what a bootcamp *should* be (let's set aside how often that's not the case, because there are obvious scams). Multi-way learning that's responsive to particular circumstances is valuable and expensive. Learning from a book is valuable and cheap. Both are good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it were, it would be because I developed and tested material up-front that I knew from actual empirical data was as effective as a book written with those particular approaches and priorities could be.
-
Simply eschewing the hard work of developing pedagogically sound content and exercises doesn't mean you've obtained some sort of victory, you're just giving your students an inferior education. Content comes first whether it lives on pages or out of a mouth.
-
Why assume that bootcamps "eschew the hard work of developing pedagogically sound content and exercises"? It sounds like what you're frustrated with is bad instruction, but you're doing so by arguing against a format of instruction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.