Regardless of what you think of the politics, that’s quite the obituary for someone that is literally known for his service to widows and the poorhttps://twitter.com/neontaster/status/948647256172974082 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I think they will certainly discuss things that made him noteworthy to the world at large. Not simply his followers.
You really don’t see any bias in this?
I see bias in everything. We all have it in spades. The Times was reporting on the newsworthiness of his passing, not trying to honor his life.
I understand that. They’re doing it terribly.
I think the Mormon community has a hard time swallowing that policies about women and homosexuals are more noteworthy to the world than his other work. I get that. But it doesn’t change the reality of what the worldwide interest is about Monson’s life.
In a similar fashion the obituary of Warren Jeffs will be markedly different by a newspaper than the one his followers would write. I assume Francis’ will talk about his activism and how he ruffled feathers.
I don’t think that’s how Monson is known to the outside world, and I don’t think Francis’ will talk about how he ruffled feathers. At all. The article at Castro’s death doesn’t give you pause?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.