It's naive to assume they couldnt just do better I assume they use the interface as a tool to communicate internally group belonging - almost like a level of mastery As in: the cool kids know when you are one of them Eg they had so many hidden features in their early days…
-
-
-
But that being said - while favorable for retention and relative growth in certain groups it limits the absolute potential of growth (mass market)
-
Dude you need a San Francisco break!!!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh man... reading that makes me feel better... I thought I was just too old to ‘get it’
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just like vim and emacs terrible UIs have been bad for adoption...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For me, improved UX will not save them or at least get users back from
@instagram stories. They need focus on core product.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is so bad that I even heard some “social media expert” claim that it is designed that way in purpose. The intent would be to form sort of a club of people who have time and interest in figuring out and discuss its features. ...right
Makes. No. Sense.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But in the world of Idiocracy... I just figured I was too old to appreciate the interface.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.