(Yes this is a joke)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My philosophy has always been if you take evil people’s money and spend it on good, then it doubles the social impact (as evil people very likely to spend their money on evil.)
-
But is it ethical for the fund manager to pass the decision to the founder? A founder’s success could greatly increase the capital and influence of a bad actor- should a founder bare that responsibility or should the gate keepers?
-
The founders should certainly have the option as to who they make rich!
-
I believe they’ll be exercising that option more and more.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Take everyone’s money. In the event they do something bad that harms America / Americans we can seize the assets to repay victims. + More capital = higher valuations = more money for investment, research & development
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.