Which of these feels like a better deal once you’re making $50k+ as a software engineer?
-
-
If its capped anyway 10% @ 3y feels easier to communicate/remember
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It depends on the person's financial circumstance and risk tolerance (if they have a family, previous student loans, and cost of living). 10% sounds better, 17% sounds too significant for someone starting out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not just give an option to pay $30k within 3/4 years at their own terms once they start earning >50K USD per year. Also "own terms" can be more attractive for a prospective student to consider. Just IMO :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wonder if it would be different it you ask in $ not %
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly, it depends on how big a burn you started with. If your expenses were already low, the bigger bite / faster payback seems smarter. If you've got non-deferable obligations, the latter may be more manageable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Me personally who just started the part time program on Monday if we were allowed I would change it to 10% for 3 years in a heartbeat I would feel more confident and comfortable with having a family and a mortgage
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
10% for 3 years is less $ to pay @ 50K.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was going to say 17%/2 until you said they were both capped at $30k. That changed my vote
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they’re capped at 30k, what does it matter? But, for me, the one that gets it over with faster would be more attractive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perception wise 10% looks like a better deal to graduates plus it’s felt less than 17%, and since both capped could be an option. Just not sure on financials for Lambda waiting 3 yrs vs 2 yrs...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even without the cap I’m sure you’d get more people going for 10, 17 just seems too close to 20
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.