Both capped at $30k
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not sure I fully understand the question. The math says 17% is the better deal.
-
Depends on salary growth
-
Ahh... that's the piece I was missing. There would have to be a fairly significant jump to make up the difference, and the two year option gives it to you sooner so you can invest/use it sooner.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I feel like some people might get in financial trouble with 17%. It's quite a chunk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
17% of salary on top of taxes + cost of living feels tight. 10% over 3 years is more comfortable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This question is apparently a Rorschach test.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s about Cash Flow/daily life benefit, not math. 10% helps you with the rest of your life needs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Could it be a choice for the student?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
does this assume that you can cover living costs in both scenarios?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on salary + living expenses
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My friend works for Cisco straight out of San Diego state. 1st year cleared over 50K, fast forward 3 years later and hes over 100K plus 250K every quarter for projects within the company
#Boom#WestCoastThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd take a different approach. If you're doing 3 years, perhaps keep it low the first year (maybe 10%?), ~13% 2nd year, 18% the 3rd year? You're at the lowest the first year since you're building exp, but a higher % becomes more manageable when exp and $ trend up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Being free of debt is worth the extra few percentage points.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's a fixed amount needed to live easily, and the 10% option leaves more funds for that fixed cost.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe they should get to pick?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And the beauty is that #2 is risk reversal: below the cap, LS makes more money if the student gets a raise. Less money if they do not. ( 2 x.17= .34, 3x.1=10) I LIKE it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That works great if you live in Chesterfield, Missouri.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Make it an option maybe? I’d guess the preference really depends on where you’re located
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even though it might not be the better deal, I’d take the 10% over the 17%. For a kid just starting out, the 17% doesn’t hurt as much as it does when you’re older with a family and a mortgage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.