We're going to try an experiment. Our full iOS + Computer Science course (30 weeks) + a MacBook you can keep + free housing in San Francisco for the full 30 weeks. You pay $0 until you're making $50k+, then 17% of salary for 3 years, capped at $40k. We'll select 10 students.
-
-
Why offer to bundle "housing" if your classes are from a remote location? Computers are very cheap, $500 or less. In the grand scheme of "getting paid only if someone is making 50k", why do you care about a $500 expense?
-
Because not everyone has that money lying around. You can also take the course without a computer and housing, and it’s cheaper.
-
It's just confusing to offer "free housing in San Francisco" for something in a remote location. Why not choose London, Paris, or some other irrelevant unrelated location. If people don't have the money lying around then why MacBooks and San Francisco housing? No caviar?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The model seems straight out of some body shops that operate in India. The only difference I see is that these guys make the students shell out for training too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a nice idea. Can it be put across to Nigeria? Thanks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You guys are killing it, man. So stoked to see you trying new ways to get the training out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.