Garbage take. Utterly ridiculous hypothetical. Just because overpriced tuition is a problem doesn't mean (THREE YEARS of) unpaid labor would be better. The worker would still need to take out loans just to pay rent. This is some silicon valley vulture nonsense.
-
-
I mean that’s fine. But your initial guess was off by 100% on educational attainment and even the revised guess shows that your hiring patterns don’t reflect your rhetoric.
-
You’d think that if you were going to make grandiose statements with your balance sheet as proof you’d at least have a reasonable sense of what the numbers actually are.
-
Ya shows that I don’t care about education
-
Also the people that I hired that do have an education id hire without one
-
it doesn't show anything other than you're capable of pulling numbers out of your ass to back up a claim you also pulled out of your ass
-
Lmao. He’s so confident in his facts he blocked me for asking a very simple question.
-
still waiting on my block. Any minute now
-
I’d bet a very large sum of money that his 25% estimate on people w/o higher education is grossly exaggerated. In economics we call this “revealed preference”.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.