-
-
-
Also curious as to the logic of which positions are remote vs in house
-
Remote vs in house is often up to the hiring manager.
-
Fascinating
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Payroll taxes? My wife works remote for a company and they only hire in states they already have people in. Don’t want to create any more work.
-
But you'd think if you're already in 40 states what's the difference of the final 10
-
But it would be 25% more. That’s significant.
-
True, but if you're a multi-billion dollar company like github I'd assume the tradeoffs would be different
-
The folks at
@github were continuing to lose money. They are only "multi-billion" in terms of purchase price, not revenue or profit. Increasing operating expense when losing money is an ugly thing to do.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Administrative overhead. Spinning up a new state for payroll used HR/legal bandwidth. New states are often new tax jurisdictions. They did great but bandwidth for that stuff is not unlimited. Hashicorp's founder made a great summary here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17022563 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tax/right to work laws, maybe?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe it was a thing for when they went more corporate and they just supported the states they already had employees in they didnt wanna lose?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some states are harder to incorporate in? LinkedIn is the same
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.