.@lawgeeknz @njhickey @MsLods @kim_weatherall of course, Walter v Lane. But I struggle to reconcile that w/ the requirement of originality.
-
-
Replying to @wenhwu
@wenhwu@njhickey@MsLods@kim_weatherall are you seriously arguing no#copyright or default shared (c) in all reported interviews?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawgeeknz
.
@lawgeeknz@njhickey@MsLods@kim_weatherall but the words are Bryson's. I understand Gerrard took them down on paper, and the effect of1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wenhwu
.
@lawgeeknz@njhickey@MsLods@kim_weatherall Walter v Lane, but I see tension between that and originality.8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wenhwu
@wenhwu@lawgeeknz@njhickey@MsLods my guess: Bryson can maybe stop this perhaps as coauthor because of length/complexity of material2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @kim_weatherall
@wenhwu@kim_weatherall@njhickey@MsLods so actor gets (c) in film, subject in her biography and model in photo-shoot (absent agmt)?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawgeeknz
.
@lawgeeknz@kim_weatherall@njhickey@MsLods no, because the maker of a film is defined in Aus Act: s.22(4)(b).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wenhwu
.
@lawgeeknz@kim_weatherall@njhickey@MsLods and neither subject nor model makes any authorial contribution to works.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wenhwu
.
@lawgeeknz@kim_weatherall@njhickey@MsLods the distinct'n btwn Bryson & biography subject is, who chooses the words in the literary work?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wenhwu
.
@lawgeeknz@kim_weatherall@njhickey@MsLods hey@AusLawReform, I hope you're listening ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@wenhwu @lawgeeknz @kim_weatherall @njhickey @MsLods Of course we're listening :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.