So, I have pretty thick skin when it comes to online harassment, but something has been really bothering me.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gaywonk
Thanks so much for outlining all of this–we’re looking into it further. Sending you a DM now.
1,093 replies 94 retweets 4,573 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
@YouTube instead of me yelling at you how about an idea for your policy: if a video is flagged & falls within your policy towards; LGBTQ, race, faith, xenophobia or etc. you will pull ads from that video. If set video isn’t changed they get pulled from your algorithm, aka no
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @GorillaKingLTD @TeamYouTube and
Crowder makes next to no money from YouTube. He has mug club and that’s how he makes money and pays his employees and continues his show
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Rshwood420 @GorillaKingLTD and
Then I suppose he won't mind it when youtube deletes the channel for flagrant harassment.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The 1st amendment guarantees you a youtube channel according to smoothbrains
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Kaijindv @gup_guppy and
It guarantees he can say what he wants. Which is what you’re trying to deny him. His right to say whatever he wants as long as it’s not a threat
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, the first Amendment guarantees the GOVERNMENT can't punish someone for saying what they want. Private companies can choose who they will allow to use their platform and it doesn't violate a damn thing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.