23% of Whites and 17% of Blacks.
-
-
Question maybe is the ratio of white-smarter to black-smarter within each group. I’ll check later
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Don't forgot the variances. LOL.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Knock yourself out! (here are the unweighted tabs)pic.twitter.com/RmMID3Zf5i
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Here ya'll go (sorry for the delay, Grafton was crazy tonight). Code here: https://github.com/cmarcum/gss pic.twitter.com/OruATxvNdc
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
To me this is the important comparison here: Whites much more likely to favor their own group than they are to favor the other. Blacks almost equally likely to favor either.pic.twitter.com/9C3oi5plyY
3 replies 5 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @familyunequal @csmarcum and
An analysis of the same data with more groups included by
@AudaciousEpigonpic.twitter.com/j2frnLfa93
3 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
how you gonna get Asians' opinions from GSS?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @familyunequal @pnin1957 and
Yeah, even with inappropriately aggregating all origins, the n very small.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The race-realist agenda here is to create the impression that the whites-are-smarter attitude is true because it is universally held.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
There is no impression that needs creating, virtually every test shows something approaching a 1 SD gap between mean white and mean black scores, not just for IQ scores but also for other things like vocabulary (Wordsum), basic scientific knowledge, etc https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2011/03/scientific-literacy-by-race.html …
-
-
Replying to @AudaciousEpigon @familyunequal and
I would like to see scientific literacy broke down by age, geography, education levels, and quality of education.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.