RT @Atul_Gawande: How to meet energy needs w/o killing earth: “From a purely scientific perspective, solar is @bv http://bv.ms/1iWLHu8
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Atul_Gawande@BV how about conservation? i reckon that we could reduce our consumption by 50% with only moderate quality of life impact.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Atul_Gawande@BV Not my field, but I was surprised geothermal didn't even merit a mention.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Atul_Gawande Ridiculous. Even at 100% efficiency, the energy density of solar makes it impractical, not to mention mfg requirements >@BV -
@Atul_Gawande > rare earths minerals scarcity, huge areas required to be covered on panels. Just nonsense.@BV
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Atul_Gawande Amen on Solar!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Atul_Gawande@BV why isn't nuclear power even mentioned in that story?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@Atul_Gawande@bv Check out An Ecomodernist Manifesto for how humans save nature http://www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto-english/ … @EcomodernismThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.