I found this one paper in a radiology journal that found that there was huge variation among peer reviewers. I am having a bit of a personal crisis realizing that this is something that researchers aren't looking at, yet so much is build upon it. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/radiology.178.3.1994394?journalCode=radiology …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
If you know of any other research on the peer review process please chime in. All I want for Christmas is renewed faith in the system.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Here's a paper that found "author‐preferred reviewers rated papers more positively than did editor‐selected reviewers, and ... were much more likely to be invited for revision than were papers reviewed by editor‐selected reviewers"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2435.12665 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
And a book from 2008 that looked at academics' attitudes about peer review, finding that most academics (85%) thought that peer review greatly improves scientific communication: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.214.9676&rep=rep1&type=pdf …
Prikaži ovu nit -
"...the system is characterized by several structural flaws (voluntary review, unstandardized review criteria, decentralized process) that have led to weakened efficiency, efficacy, and quality control." Good paper on the issues with peer review:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/brv.12185?casa_token=BIqFlxIXhGYAAAAA%3Ad0Kk78xC8wkRzlawRGP-28LjbwU0oy52V-7ValUSVor1vMwsjikgSALRe_9dbR_sEWipfAeqzaFYyKJG …
Prikaži ovu nit -
And, yes, this is how I want to spend my Friday night. Thanks.
Prikaži ovu nit -
There is a crazy level of wasted effort in the peer review process. Anybody ever have a paper rejected after meticulously responding to every reviewer comment and doing every single thing asked? How much author & reviewer time is wasted in this process?
Prikaži ovu nit -
It seems like one potential solution would be to professionalize editorships, like they do for journals like the Nature journals, where editors are editors for a living. Most editors of academic journals are not trained in editing, just like profs aren't trained in reviewing.
Prikaži ovu nit -
I have been writing more for a general audience and the process of working with professional editors (e.g.,
@thekibosch at@Slate,@jfischman at@sciam) is a dream compared to most journal editors. And same goes for@PatrickGoymer at@NatureEcoEvo and John Carson@NatureHumBehavPrikaži ovu nit -
And had an amazing experience with peer review for my book at
@PrincetonUPress with@AlisonKalett, went through 2 intense rounds of review and rewrote half the book as a result. The whole thing was so helpful and so professional. We need editors like that in academic journals.Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.