Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
And if you’re thinking anything along the lines of “sweet, we made moon beings!” Then stop. Think carefully. WE made something on ANOTHER world that we do not fully understand. It has an environment, even if we deemed it “barren” to any life on earth. Even if it is close to us.
What you are doing is showing excitement at the long history of forcing OUR values, systems, and in this case, living beings on another world. That is not our right, and it is not our job. If we carry on with that mentality, even if we took away the “colonization” word —
— the premise is the same. It’s colonialism. It’s imperialism. It’s not for us. And if our science carries on under the same institutions of imperialism, in the name of the same government and not for all of humanity, it is not science. No matter what you call it.
And yes I am aware there’s literal human shit on the moon, and there are portions where it is contaminated, just like Mars. But that doesn’t give us license to colonize. It gives us something to create new protection and ethics policy off of.
Ok y’all we have OFFICIALLY gotten to the point of white dudes – yes, JUST white dudes so far! – telling a biology-based planetary scientist about the barrenness of the moon and how they resent the use of the term colonialism like that totally isn’t what they’re all about!
You know what that means! Time to play the Reply Guy drinking game! good lord it’s like some of y’all didn’t even do the reading! :) the bar is LOW here y’all, who’s tryna get hydrated!
Not to cut your explanation short, but do you realize that there are gazillion-zillion galaxies and stars and planets out there and this act and the worse that we can do is still nothing multiplied by null, Universe-wise? And Nature don't give a shxt obliterating planets&stars?
It's highly reasonable to assume that a NASA Astrobiologist has a very firm understanding of the size of the universe, yes.
If we do not bring our values to new worlds, are you suggesting we leave the worlds valueless? What are you trying to protect, exactly?
If you're okay with me asking, do you have any articles where you expand on how you feel about humans creating their own habitats/literally colonizing other worlds? My takeaway from this thread is that you're against it and I'd like to read into the reasoning if that's the case
Panspermia had to start somewhere
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
