there were other factors also! I literally say that right there in the tweet -- pipe down ppl
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's also about the differential impact of cable news. >50 voters are influenced a lot by cable tv & Pete got the most uninterrupted positive coverage. Harris/Castro were erased & Booker was an afterthought. Warren also had a very positive stretch of cable tv cvg as she rose.
-
Bingo. This all makes sense when u factor in that the average viewing age of CNN is over 65.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yet there are many who still believe Iowa and New Hampshire hasn't and won't impact the race lol.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Because the best candidates are the ones who insist people with limited financial resources carry the full burden of campaign financing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, any questions get raised about a POC's bona fides and *whoosh* we're back to a white dude (whose bona fides go largely unquestioned).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Booker spending the bulk of his career as an unregistered agent of the pharma industry when healthcare is voter's #1 issue may have been a factor.
-
And in his first foray into presidential politics he thought attacking Obama for going after private equity was a winning issue
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My switch from Kamala to Pete had nothing to do with this...esp since...I’m not white. She had a lot of momentum out of the gate but could not find a message. Also bIack ppl went for Biden over them!!
-
Thank to for joining
#TeamPete - still heartbroken about Kamala but she’s a force of nature. She’s gonna be around for a long time
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.