The equivocating ‘both sides’ line suggests @AsstSecStateAF doesn’t grasp the key issue: the Nigerian military’s long-running, acute human rights deficiencies that complicate bilateral security cooperation and exacerbate
’s security challenges. Disappointing.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs: What happened was not a "clash". The murderous Nigerian army brutally murdered 60+ Shia civilians on a religious procession them used Trump Tweet of shooting Stone-throwing protesters to justify the massacre.
@IntlCrimCourtpic.twitter.com/pzb1npVHap
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dear Sir/Oyinbo, In my village when one side is holding AK47 and the other have STONES it can only be called massacre and not CLASHES. Thank You
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well if you are 'very concerned' Sir, one of the best approach is to call on the Nigerian Security Forces (the killing machine) to exercise restraint and stop the abuse/massacre of the IMN. Being evasive and economical with the truth is when you say 'both sides'.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What happened in Nigeria is wrong on the side of the military...even in the USA we all say the liberals do their protest...everyone has a right to protest what he feels is injustices it's in the Nigerian constitution...soldiers just killed lawful citizens
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not a clash, sir. The Nigeria Army, a killing machine of sort, decimated those protesters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Both sides? You've obviously not seen the videos. Only one side has been partaking in massacre.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
What should the US do? If they talk, people like
@cchukudebelu would be on here screaming "recolonization"! Abeg, solve your problem, by yourself. -
I understand, but the United States has many powerful diplomatic tools, some of which may surprise you. What individual
#Nigerians say on Twitter will likely have no effect on what they decide to do. They have more control over#Buhari and his army than what we know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@MBuhari Buhari and the Chief of Army staff Buratai ordered the murder of the unarmed protesters. They’re murderers and should be charged for murderThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was not a "clash" as you claimed. It was a brutal and inhuman massacre of 60+ peaceful Shia mourners in Abuja by the Nigerian army.
#FreeZakzakyhttps://twitter.com/USEmbassyAbuja/status/1057951541775265792 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@reaDonaldTrump Has Nigeria got laws? Because as far as the people on the street are concerned, the Nigerian government respects no laws. Which means@AsstSecStateAF and@USEmbassyAbuja are supporting a brutal government. Shame to them, very dirty politicans.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our deepest concern is drawn from d alibi that could now be used on d account of
@POTUS ordering the military to shoot rock throwing immigrants. This is a classic case of what happened in Nigeria.@channelstv@NTANewsNow@AIT_Online@SilverbirdTV@HQNigerianArmy@OfficialAPCNgThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Both sides"? You mean Shiites protesting against the unlawful detention of their leader share in the blame?
@realDonaldTrump really needs to drain the swamp of politically correct diplomats who make politically correct statements instead of calling a spade a spade. -
Trump is too busy ordering their own soldiers to shoot at stone throwers so that's highly unlikely. Diplomats aren't the problem in this case
-
Trump is talking about FOREIGN NATIONALS threatening the national borders of a country. NIGERIAN ARMY is shooting at NIGERIANS. If you don't understand the BIG difference, I can't help you.
-
Both are wrong. The people he's advocating violence against aren't threatening any national borders. They're refugees coming to the border to seek asylum which is the internationally recognized process for asylum seeking
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.