It has nothing to do with what I believe. It's a legal finding by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention after a 16 month deliberation.
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal @katebevan
Which has been widely rubbished the world over as frankly absurd.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @greg_baker @katebevan
It's been rubbished by the UK because it lost, twice. Meanwhile, the world over supports UN https://justice4assange.com/UN-Consequences.html#500 … http://freeassangenow.org
3 replies 7 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @katebevan @greg_baker
Yes, the UN is a global body, unlike Westminster. Happy to share the view of this case outside the UK/London bubble http://www.firstpost.com/world/around-500-signatories-including-nobel-prize-winners-ask-uk-to-release-julian-assange-2650822.html …pic.twitter.com/Eq1HqHi8j3
1 reply 9 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @greg_baker
I think you've just given me an excellent example of the appeal-to-authority logical fallacy.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @katebevan @greg_baker
If your view is that the Rule of Law is a logical fallacy, I don't see how this conversation can progress in a productive manner.
1 reply 6 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @katebevan
If you think that that decision in any way represents the rule of law I seriously doubt the veracity of your knowledge of jurisprudence...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @greg_baker @katebevan
I know it hurts to lose, but the WGAD decision is clear, and the ICCPR is binding on the UK. Here's some UN guidance http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=17013&LangID=E …pic.twitter.com/1RLlr34UVA
2 replies 10 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @katebevan
I give up, it is not a court, it has no judicial authority. If I recall there wasn't a single practicing lawyer on the panel.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
It is a judicial authority fo the purposes of ECtHR Article 35 §2 (admissability), excludes cases that have already been decided by the WGADpic.twitter.com/AyntbFksP8
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal @katebevan
If you are being that selective for your purposes. Could it be you are clutching at straws? Anyway you'll not listen, you're a cultist. Bye
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

