-
-
I give up, it is not a court, it has no judicial authority. If I recall there wasn't a single practicing lawyer on the panel.
-
It is a judicial authority fo the purposes of ECtHR Article 35 §2 (admissability), excludes cases that have already been decided by the WGADpic.twitter.com/AyntbFksP8
-
If you are being that selective for your purposes. Could it be you are clutching at straws? Anyway you'll not listen, you're a cultist. Bye
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

