Oh, I'd forgotten about that. They're both dreadful. Pilger is an Assange groupie, too.
If your view is that the Rule of Law is a logical fallacy, I don't see how this conversation can progress in a productive manner.
-
-
If you think that that decision in any way represents the rule of law I seriously doubt the veracity of your knowledge of jurisprudence...
-
I know it hurts to lose, but the WGAD decision is clear, and the ICCPR is binding on the UK. Here's some UN guidance http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=17013&LangID=E …pic.twitter.com/1RLlr34UVA
-
I give up, it is not a court, it has no judicial authority. If I recall there wasn't a single practicing lawyer on the panel.
-
It is a judicial authority fo the purposes of ECtHR Article 35 §2 (admissability), excludes cases that have already been decided by the WGADpic.twitter.com/AyntbFksP8
-
If you are being that selective for your purposes. Could it be you are clutching at straws? Anyway you'll not listen, you're a cultist. Bye
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

