Are you afraid of reading the original reports? Here's what Women Against Rape say about the case:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/23/women-against-rape-julian-assange …
-
-
There's no-one judging, over 6 years later, because there's no charge. That's a miscarriage of justice even you cannot deny.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
The Swedish courts disagree: it is the prosecutor's actions that have led to a 6-year delay to the detriment of all involved.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The UN has denounced the situation as violating Assange's rights under the ICCPR. Sweden is in contempt of the UN decision.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The foremost legal experts in the field disagree. Even if you don't like him, he still has rights.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcw3SKVRUbM …
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
It's not bending over backwards, it is abiding by their international obligations. In fact, he's been discriminated against.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.