well #assange haven't submitted for questioning. Which he could do it he wanted. @Sveahovratt @hazelpress2
-
-
That's not how it works. The only one with a duty to progress the case is the prosecutor.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @viskot and
Despite this, Assange proactively tried to give his statement, prosecutor refused to take it
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @viskot and
In 2014 & 2015, the Swedish courts acknowledged prosecutor had gravely misshandled the case.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
not relevant to the discussion.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Courts condemnations irrelevant? The prosecutor is the only one to blame for 6 year delay.
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @viskot and
That is the very definition of abuse of power & violation of basic due process rights.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
nope, ha has been granted every right but demands privileges.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Hardly. Sweden's legal community views this case as abusive & wrong.http://www.dagensjuridik.se/2016/09/haktningen-av-julian-assange-borde-havas-men-kommer-sannolikt-forlangas-imorgon …
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
the court doesn't. It's opinion is the one that matters.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There's a lot of prestige involved. The UN experts panel considers it unlawful. That matters
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal
not much though. As the court also notes.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress20 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.