good so then you can explained to @BellaMagnani why the wording of @Sveahovratt is logical?
-
-
Replying to @viskot
.
@viskot#Sweden takes 6yrs to even question uncharged#Assange in word v word case. Everything rosy in@Sveahovratt's garden. @hazelpress21 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BellaMagnani
well
#assange haven't submitted for questioning. Which he could do it he wanted.@Sveahovratt @hazelpress22 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's not how it works. The only one with a duty to progress the case is the prosecutor.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @viskot and
Despite this, Assange proactively tried to give his statement, prosecutor refused to take it
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @viskot and
In 2014 & 2015, the Swedish courts acknowledged prosecutor had gravely misshandled the case.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
In today's judgment, the court of appeal acknowledges prosecutor's negligence in this case.
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal
not really.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress20 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.