good so then you can explained to @BellaMagnani why the wording of @Sveahovratt is logical?
-
-
Despite this, Assange proactively tried to give his statement, prosecutor refused to take it
-
In 2014 & 2015, the Swedish courts acknowledged prosecutor had gravely misshandled the case.
-
not relevant to the discussion.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress2 -
Courts condemnations irrelevant? The prosecutor is the only one to blame for 6 year delay.
-
That is the very definition of abuse of power & violation of basic due process rights.
-
nope, ha has been granted every right but demands privileges.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress2 -
Hardly. Sweden's legal community views this case as abusive & wrong.http://www.dagensjuridik.se/2016/09/haktningen-av-julian-assange-borde-havas-men-kommer-sannolikt-forlangas-imorgon …
-
the court doesn't. It's opinion is the one that matters.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress2 - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
yes that is how it works. At least according to the court.
@BellaMagnani@Sveahovratt @hazelpress2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.