False. His lawyers arguments were erxamined and dismissed.
-
-
-
No. There's no consideration of ICCPR violations, which are binding. Ruling makes claims re Ecuador, who isn't a party to the case.
-
Euador WAS party in the bilateral negotiations reg.assistance in crimnal matters btw. Ecuador+Sweden.
-
What's your point?
-
Its a reply to ur claim that Ecuador was mentioned in the finding wto being party to the case.
-
It is not a party to the case. That is correct.
-
But since JA will be questioned by an Ecuadorian prosecutor inside the Ecuadorian embassy Ecuador is rightfully mentioned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
praising prosecutor for making progress and blaming Ecuador for delays! Amazing. What planet is Sweden on?
-
Good time to recall Ecuador's offer Sweden, 6 days after Assange entered the embassy in 2012.https://twitter.com/suigenerisjen/status/631481423728353280 …
-
yes and nobody in Sweden has ever even tried to explain why Ny did not take up that offer. Appalling.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.