SC ought to reopen the case to resolve uncertainty, esp. now Assange excluded from Extradition Act reform
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal
(i) It can't; and (ii) there's no uncertainty.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Roblev0 @AssangeLegal
Even Mance doesn't say Assange uncertain.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
He says the case can't be reopened but clarified SC got it wrong in the point that persuaded most judges.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
Nowhere in Bucnys does Mance say Assange wrong. His comment on the VCLT point doesn't say that.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Do you agree Mance says Phillips application of VCLT to the Framework Decision was wrong in law?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @Roblev0
can argue how you have the judgment wrong (&a you have) but Assange judgment stands. Do you believe in rule of law?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nearlylegal @Roblev0
It's not my argument. It's the Supreme Court's.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Roblev0 @nearlylegal
Bucnys says Philips got it wrong. I recommend Paterson's take on problems of Assange SC case: https://www.amazon.com/Final-Judgment-Lords-Supreme-Court-ebook/dp/B00LC4S956/ref=sr_1_1/163-2288232-4084657?ie=UTF8&qid=1472333674&sr=8-1&keywords=%22final+judgment%22+paterson …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Paterson is damning of the Supreme Court in the Assange case for entirely different reasons. He's very well-respected.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.