Untrue. Only Dyson relied solely on Philips's 5th ground. Kerr, Brown, Walker> @nearlylegal @DrJillStein
-
-
No, it's really not.
@nearlylegal -
Bucnys says Philips got it wrong. I recommend Paterson's take on problems of Assange SC case: https://www.amazon.com/Final-Judgment-Lords-Supreme-Court-ebook/dp/B00LC4S956/ref=sr_1_1/163-2288232-4084657?ie=UTF8&qid=1472333674&sr=8-1&keywords=%22final+judgment%22+paterson …
-
Paterson is damning of the Supreme Court in the Assange case for entirely different reasons. He's very well-respected.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It really isn’t.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.