>dissented in Assange; but even in Bucnys he does not say that Assange wrongly decided. @nearlylegal @DrJillStein
Do you agree Mance says Phillips application of VCLT to the Framework Decision was wrong in law?
-
-
can argue how you have the judgment wrong (&a you have) but Assange judgment stands. Do you believe in rule of law?
-
It's not my argument. It's the Supreme Court's.
-
No, it's really not.
@nearlylegal -
Bucnys says Philips got it wrong. I recommend Paterson's take on problems of Assange SC case: https://www.amazon.com/Final-Judgment-Lords-Supreme-Court-ebook/dp/B00LC4S956/ref=sr_1_1/163-2288232-4084657?ie=UTF8&qid=1472333674&sr=8-1&keywords=%22final+judgment%22+paterson …
-
Paterson is damning of the Supreme Court in the Assange case for entirely different reasons. He's very well-respected.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.