Oh is that the one she is on about? I couldn’t believe that could be so.
-
-
Yes, only 'the one' where the Supreme Court says they got it wrong in Assange. Go back to law school.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
Oddly, i can't find anywhere in Bucnys where they say Assange wrong. Repeared confirmation that>
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(repeated)>per Assange, prosecutors were to judicial authorities under Framework Agreement...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Roblev0
>and no suggestion Assange wrong on that.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
SC erroneously applied VCLT to interpret 'judicial authority' in FD on EAWs.This point decided the case.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
No. It was one of 5 reasons in the leading judgment. Mance (who delivered the Bucnys judgment)>
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Roblev0
>dissented in Assange; but even in Bucnys he does not say that Assange wrongly decided.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Para 39: VCLT not applicable to Framework Decision. 36: argument decided Assange.pic.twitter.com/Fbr6741BSb
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
First sentence of 36 doesn't mean what you say.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You're right, the highlight should have been further downpic.twitter.com/BcMklxaQDG
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.