Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
AssangeLegal's profile
Hanna Jonasson
Hanna Jonasson
Hanna Jonasson
@AssangeLegal

Tweets

Hanna Jonasson

@AssangeLegal

Doctoral candidate in international law; editor http://justice4assange.com 

justice4assange.com
Joined July 2011

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Nearly Legal‏ @nearlylegal 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @AssangeLegal @DrJillStein

      Go on then, when did the SC say it’s own decision was “legally incorrect”? In those words.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Hanna Jonasson‏ @AssangeLegal 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

      So you don't know. Here's a hint: November 2013. I will send you an invoice. I charge 'non-lawyer' rates. :)

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Nearly Legal‏ @nearlylegal 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @AssangeLegal @DrJillStein

      That does not surprise me. Go on then, where does the SC say it's own decision was wrong in law?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Hanna Jonasson‏ @AssangeLegal 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

      Yes: In 2013 SC says the single point that decided Assange's case was wrong in law.Why I shd do your work for you?

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    5. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @AssangeLegal

      In Bucnys the SC judgment repeatedly confirmed that Assange is good law. @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Nearly Legal‏ @nearlylegal 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @Roblev0 @AssangeLegal @DrJillStein

      Oh is that the one she is on about? I couldn’t believe that could be so.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Hanna Jonasson‏ @AssangeLegal 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @nearlylegal @Roblev0 @DrJillStein

      Yes, only 'the one' where the Supreme Court says they got it wrong in Assange. Go back to law school.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @AssangeLegal

      Oddly, i can't find anywhere in Bucnys where they say Assange wrong. Repeared confirmation that> @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @Roblev0 @AssangeLegal @nearlylegal

      (repeated)>per Assange, prosecutors were to judicial authorities under Framework Agreement...

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @Roblev0

      >and no suggestion Assange wrong on that. @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Hanna Jonasson‏ @AssangeLegal 27 Aug 2016
      Replying to @Roblev0 @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

      SC erroneously applied VCLT to interpret 'judicial authority' in FD on EAWs.This point decided the case.

      1:26 PM - 27 Aug 2016
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @AssangeLegal

          No. It was one of 5 reasons in the leading judgment. Mance (who delivered the Bucnys judgment)> @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @Roblev0

          >dissented in Assange; but even in Bucnys he does not say that Assange wrongly decided. @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Hanna Jonasson‏ @AssangeLegal 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @Roblev0 @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

          This argument alone persuaded the 3 otherwise undecided SC judges. There were 7. 2 dissented. Do the math

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @AssangeLegal

          Untrue. Only Dyson relied solely on Philips's 5th ground. Kerr, Brown, Walker> @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @Roblev0

          >either didn't comment on other 4 or accepted them @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @Roblev0 @AssangeLegal and

          Walker @ 94; Brown @ 95; Kerr @ 109-110

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. Hanna Jonasson‏ @AssangeLegal 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @Roblev0 @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

          SC ought to reopen the case to resolve uncertainty, esp. now Assange excluded from Extradition Act reform

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. (((Robin Levett)))‏ @Roblev0 27 Aug 2016
          Replying to @AssangeLegal

          (i) It can't; and (ii) there's no uncertainty. @nearlylegal @DrJillStein

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        10. 9 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info