Same allegation, same facts. He was cleared. Different prosecutor. A negligent one who's done nothing for 6 years.
-
-
In Bucnys the SC judgment repeatedly confirmed that Assange is good law.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein -
Oh is that the one she is on about? I couldn’t believe that could be so.
-
Yes, only 'the one' where the Supreme Court says they got it wrong in Assange. Go back to law school.
-
Oddly, i can't find anywhere in Bucnys where they say Assange wrong. Repeared confirmation that>
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein -
(repeated)>per Assange, prosecutors were to judicial authorities under Framework Agreement...
-
>and no suggestion Assange wrong on that.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein -
SC erroneously applied VCLT to interpret 'judicial authority' in FD on EAWs.This point decided the case.
-
No. It was one of 5 reasons in the leading judgment. Mance (who delivered the Bucnys judgment)>
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein - 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Go on, citation? Where did they say there decision in Assange's case was wrong in law?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.