If your acts are from that site, it is wrong. We are talking about the potential charges for which the EAW issued
You obviously don't know what I am refering to do you? What case am I refering to?
-
-
Go on then, when did the SC say it’s own decision was “legally incorrect”? In those words.
-
So you don't know. Here's a hint: November 2013. I will send you an invoice. I charge 'non-lawyer' rates. :)
-
That does not surprise me. Go on then, where does the SC say it's own decision was wrong in law?
-
Yes: In 2013 SC says the single point that decided Assange's case was wrong in law.Why I shd do your work for you?
-
In Bucnys the SC judgment repeatedly confirmed that Assange is good law.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein -
Oh is that the one she is on about? I couldn’t believe that could be so.
-
Yes, only 'the one' where the Supreme Court says they got it wrong in Assange. Go back to law school.
-
Oddly, i can't find anywhere in Bucnys where they say Assange wrong. Repeared confirmation that>
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein - 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.