Closed on 25 August 2010. Because "no crime whatsoever had been committed by Assange" in relation to 'rape'.
-
-
I'm sorry, I have better things to do than fact-check Assange-case for you point by point. http://justice4assange.com/assange-case-fact-checker.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @DrJillStein
If your acts are from that site, it is wrong. We are talking about the potential charges for which the EAW issued
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh, I see. No actual answer will be forthcoming. Sadly, I am not surprised.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nearlylegal @DrJillStein
Hanna Jonasson Retweeted Hanna Jonasson
For the record that's my answer:https://twitter.com/AssangeLegal/status/769595938969190400 …
Hanna Jonasson added,
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @DrJillStein
It isn’t an answer. It isn’t even a step on the way to an answer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nearlylegal @DrJillStein
Same allegation, same facts. He was cleared. Different prosecutor. A negligent one who's done nothing for 6 years.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @DrJillStein
You agree that Assange skipped bail rather than answer those questions?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nearlylegal @DrJillStein
No. He has consistently offered his statement since Sept 2010. He applied for asylum in embassy, that's his right.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @DrJillStein
No, he hasn’t. He has refused to attend in Sweden, then set impossible conditions when skipped bail.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
2010-15: Sweden interrogated 44 people but refused to take Assange's statement. What conditions? You're wrong.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.