The case was closed. There was no case to answer. That's more than cleared.
No. He has consistently offered his statement since Sept 2010. He applied for asylum in embassy, that's his right.
-
-
No, he hasn’t. He has refused to attend in Sweden, then set impossible conditions when skipped bail.
-
2010-15: Sweden interrogated 44 people but refused to take Assange's statement. What conditions? You're wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Asylum from what? A lawful warrant?
-
US attempts to prosecute WikiLeaks for espionage. UK & Sweden refuse to recognise he is a persecuted journalist.
-
Because he isn’t in the UK or Sweden. This is not difficult. Also, a potential rape charge is not persecution
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.