Yes. Cleared. Read the fact-checker."no crime whatsoever has been committed". That's cleared.
Same allegation, same facts. He was cleared. Different prosecutor. A negligent one who's done nothing for 6 years.
-
-
You agree that there is a EWA for Assange to answer the prosecutor’s questions?
-
Parliament amended legislation in 2014 because of Sweden's abusive EAW against Assange. ie extradition w/t charge.
-
No, the amend was in response to Symeou case. And Assange would not meet s21B conditions, as refused q’s.
-
Symeou & Assange. Supreme Court distanced itself from Assange extradition decision in 2013, as legally incorrect.
-
No, it found it was legally correct. What sort of lawyer are you?
-
You obviously don't know what I am refering to do you? What case am I refering to?
-
Go on then, when did the SC say it’s own decision was “legally incorrect”? In those words.
-
So you don't know. Here's a hint: November 2013. I will send you an invoice. I charge 'non-lawyer' rates. :)
- 26 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You agree that Assange skipped bail rather than answer those questions?
-
No. He has consistently offered his statement since Sept 2010. He applied for asylum in embassy, that's his right.
-
No, he hasn’t. He has refused to attend in Sweden, then set impossible conditions when skipped bail.
-
2010-15: Sweden interrogated 44 people but refused to take Assange's statement. What conditions? You're wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One prosecutor dropped the charges; then, on appeal by the victims, another reinstated them.
@nearlylegal@DrJillStein -
You mean on appeal by Swedish politician Claes Borgstrom? The woman said police put her under duress.
-
No, by the alleged victims. And Supreme Courts in both countries confirm original prosecutor wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh I see, that route. So you agree that the English Courts found the allegations would be rape in England?
-
UK Courts weren't able to look at the case merits. Only face of EAW-which the woman herself said 'police made up'.
-
That is, of course, nonsense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You agree that parties sought for questioning don’t get to set conditions as to how, when and where?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.