Yes. Cleared. Read the fact-checker."no crime whatsoever has been committed". That's cleared.
-
-
It isn’t an answer. It isn’t even a step on the way to an answer.
-
Same allegation, same facts. He was cleared. Different prosecutor. A negligent one who's done nothing for 6 years.
-
You agree that there is a EWA for Assange to answer the prosecutor’s questions?
-
Parliament amended legislation in 2014 because of Sweden's abusive EAW against Assange. ie extradition w/t charge.
-
No, the amend was in response to Symeou case. And Assange would not meet s21B conditions, as refused q’s.
-
Symeou & Assange. Supreme Court distanced itself from Assange extradition decision in 2013, as legally incorrect.
-
No, it found it was legally correct. What sort of lawyer are you?
-
You obviously don't know what I am refering to do you? What case am I refering to?
- 28 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Reminder, we are talking the potential charges for which the EAW issued.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.