'Facts' presented on Swedish prosecution website re #Assange vastly differ from those presented to UK Supreme Court:https://www.scribd.com/document/80912442/Agreed-Facts-Assange-Case …
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal
Mr R called Mr H an "unreliable witness", adding: "I do not accept this was a genuine mistake. It cannot have slipped his mind
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RiddarCarpo
You refer to magistrate's findings in UK lowest court. I refer to the Swedish prosecutor's own account in UK's Supreme Court.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
and Assange was all this time prepared to travel to the ecuadoran embsy in Sthlm to be questioned? Sounds like a 2xface save
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @RiddarCarpo
Don't take my word for it. It's in the agreed statement of facts, which was jointly written by prosecutor + Assange lawyers.
6:47 AM - 12 Aug 2016
0 replies
1 retweet
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.