Read the opinion, and note that the prosecutor made unsuccessful attempts @ contacting Hurtig, not vice versa
-
-
-
The document above is a whole year later- 2012. It collects all the facts agreed as true between the parties.
-
It includes magistrate court's 2011 findings & also records Assange's attempts to be questioned Sept+Oct 2010.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mr R called Mr H an "unreliable witness", adding: "I do not accept this was a genuine mistake. It cannot have slipped his mind
-
You refer to magistrate's findings in UK lowest court. I refer to the Swedish prosecutor's own account in UK's Supreme Court.
-
and Assange was all this time prepared to travel to the ecuadoran embsy in Sthlm to be questioned? Sounds like a 2xface save
-
Assange remained in Sweden for 5 weeks, waiting. He then sought permission from prosecutor to leave Sweden, which he obtained.
-
there's my Game Boy to your PSP's on the practical issues. I lie (siesta) corrected.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What it in particular? Attorney Hurtig was reprimanded harshly by the Swedish BA for giving false statements->
-
Irrespective of Hurtig: there's evidence, acknowledged by prosecutor, that Assange did take steps to be int'wd.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if the differences are attributable to those statements you have have your explanation
-
Differences not attributable to those statements. Sweden presented facts to UK Supreme Court in Feb 2012. Contrast w/
@aklagare
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
..The statement was a deliberate attempt to mislead the court."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.