Fact checker is all referenced w/ court docs. One woman was a politician.Prosecutor didn't bother to pursue her case
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal @Snowden
has any actual journalists fact checked and reported this? No, cause it's not true
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ConnorPatrick @Snowden
They have outside the US. Here's two. http://espresso.repubblica.it/internazionale/2015/10/16/news/five-years-confined-new-foia-documents-shed-light-on-the-julian-assange-case-1.235129 … http://johnpilger.com/articles/assange-the-untold-story-of-an-epic-struggle-for-justice … Just read the court documents.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
-
Replying to @ConnorPatrick @Snowden
Are those your yardstick for truth? Are UK/Sweden/UN official court documents not good enough? No wonder you're lost
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @Snowden
corroboration from the impartial is one of the best ways to judge reality. No wonder you're a crack pot
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ConnorPatrick @Snowden
Here's news for you. Courts and UN expert panels are more impartial than corporate funded media. Read their findings
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @Snowden
you're calling the guardian and the intercept corporate funded? What? You can't find ANY impartial sources?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ConnorPatrick @Snowden
Yes, and yes. I gave you three impartial sources. The courts and the UN. Follow the links. It's not that difficult.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
I gave you links to 2 very well-respected journos. Your perspective ends with Guardian & Intercept.Are you American?
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal @Snowden
no way those sources are well respected
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.