You can stop believing WikiLeaks' PR about itself, unless you still think doxing rates as investigative journalism.http://finance.yahoo.com/news/wikileaks-dnc-leak-assange-russia-163854503.html …
-
-
Replying to @robpegoraro
.
@robpegoraro@digiphile The fallacy of this tweet, of course, is that@wikileaks never claimed to be "investigative journalism."2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @JamesToscano @robpegoraro
"Like other media outlets conducting investigative journalism" https://wikileaks.ch/About.html
2 replies 4 retweets 6 likes -
The Hill, Gawker and others published alleged DNC docouments months ago. Only WikiLeaks had impact.
10 replies 121 retweets 172 likes -
Replying to @wikileaks @robpegoraro
The impact from publication derived from the contents of the emails, not the PII included in them.
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @digiphile @robpegoraro
The vastly increased impact is because WikiLeaks gets more, publishes more and has a 100% record for accuracy.
5 replies 125 retweets 217 likes -
Replying to @wikileaks @robpegoraro
Is accuracy publishing the Social Security & passport numbers of private citizens online in the public interest?
4 replies 2 retweets 9 likes
these details have not been secure for years, it seems. Organizations should encrypt confidential data.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.