Don't know why I bother repeating but it's not. I'll end: emails nothing; DB publicized new & dangerous. Bye.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
Thanks, I’m aware of what you said abt that. I was specifically asking
@BellaMagnani to make her explain her claim.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Trace the history. This new dump contains the emails that Wikileaks made searchable; it's what they're working with/from.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @PeterMonnerjahn
While everyone nitpicks because I was cautious in providing a roadmap, emails ALSO have private info & no public interest.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
I’m prepared to defend you on that point. But you were certainly not cautious when you claimed that WL “dumped” the db. Just false.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
I disagree. WL dumped it on the world. Not otherwise public or known. I picked vague but accurate word to avoid roadmap.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
And you mean not known *to you*. Also, you must be aware that “dump” implies more responsibility than “link to”.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
No, trace the history. This was a new "op." I consider repeatedly publicizing to millions as if part of "leak", "a dump" .
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @PeterMonnerjahn
I mean, if the whole criticism of my piece is the vague but accurate word I used to avoid roadmap? Okay. Let's talk rest.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @PeterMonnerjahn
The criticism is: defending Erdogan's blocking of WikiLeaks because of linking to external material. Slippery slope
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
While claiming to be 'anti-censorship'
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.