You, with your MAINSTREAM facts and MAINSTREAM reasoned arguments don't count; because we KNOW. We are in on TRUTH.https://twitter.com/trewloy/status/741945312265285632 …
-
-
Replying to @Uncivil_S
I suppose it would be the act of a spoilsport to point to them that Assange hasn’t actually been charged with any offence yet?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IMSpardagus
Charging in Swedish system comes later than in UK. Have you read
@DavidAllenGreen 's long blog explanation?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Uncivil_S @davidallengreen
I confess I haven’t. I’m aware that the systems differ. Still hard to see him yet as a “fugitive from justice”.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IMSpardagus @Uncivil_S
's analysis is dated & biased. Use this fact-checker based on court findings http://justice4assange.com/assange-case-fact-checker …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @Uncivil_S
I must say I have never regarded
@DavidAllenGreen as biased and in my experience his analysis is usually sound.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IMSpardagus @Uncivil_S
Hanna Jonasson Retweeted Hanna Jonasson
See https://twitter.com/assangeVsweden/status/631110499212484608 … https://twitter.com/assangeVsweden/status/631112511983517696 …. He represents UK's position on Assange. No independent analysis
Hanna Jonasson added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal @IMSpardagus
@JackofKent Nonsense. He comes to his own independent view in the material. He might be wrong; he isn't biased.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Uncivil_S @IMSpardagus
Completely disregarding Swedish court's crucial finding against Assange's prosecutor is not an 'independent view'.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
One can't just ignore a key judicial finding & pretend it doesn't exist just because it doesn't suit one's narrative
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.