@Klamberg Sweden Supreme Court in May 2015 confirmed prosecutor was violating her professinal duty re #Assange @UNHumanRights @Alfreddezayas
-
-
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas in which para does the Supreme Court say the Prosecutor violates her profesional duties? 2/23 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Klamberg
@Klamberg@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas I'm happy to find the paras for you if you are interested in reading the two judgments.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas I have already read them, please enlighten me by using pinpoint references1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Klamberg
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas Paras 17-19 of the Supreme Court judgment and this passange from Svea Court of Appeal.pic.twitter.com/z53LuQmLBb
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas A. Court also writes Assange can leave Embassy whenever he wants&it is not detention-based on ECtHR case law1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Klamberg
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas UN experts considered & rejected this. Extensive ECHR caselaw supports#Assange paras 35-49 https://justice4assange.com/IMG/pdf/assange-wgad.pdf …1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas in which para do UNWGAD mention and discuss the fact that Assange entered the Embassy voluntarily?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Klamberg
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas Assange exercises fundamental right to seek asylum. UK spends $20m encircling embassy, Sweden acting arbitrarily.4 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange article 41 of the Vienna convention provides that diplomats have an obligation to respect laws of the receiving state (UK)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.