States that pick & choose when #humanrights apply undermine the concept of human rights http://ow.ly/YkRmA
-
-
Replying to @UNHumanRights
Can
@UNHumanRights inform@Alfreddezayas that the arrest warrant confirmed by Supreme Courts of Sweden&UK concerns rape, not whistleblowing?8 replies 7 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Klamberg
@Klamberg Sweden Supreme Court in May 2015 confirmed prosecutor was violating her professinal duty re#Assange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas in which para does the Supreme Court say the Prosecutor violates her profesional duties? 2/23 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Klamberg
@Klamberg@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas I'm happy to find the paras for you if you are interested in reading the two judgments.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas I have already read them, please enlighten me by using pinpoint references1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Klamberg
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas Paras 17-19 of the Supreme Court judgment and this passange from Svea Court of Appeal.pic.twitter.com/z53LuQmLBb
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas yes Appeals court critical, the Prosecutor took due notice&action of this which made Supreme Court content1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Klamberg @Alfreddezayas Prosecutor ignored Court of Appeal's rebuke for 4 months. Only changed her position when she was bound to lose SC.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.